<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Blog on Benjamin Pagani</title>
    <link>https://benjaminpagani.com/blog/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Blog on Benjamin Pagani</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://benjaminpagani.com/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>OS/2 Chess 3.0</title>
      <link>https://benjaminpagani.com/blog/os2-chess-3.0/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://benjaminpagani.com/blog/os2-chess-3.0/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I was recently working with &lt;a href=&#34;https://winworldpc.com/product/os-2-warp-4/os-2-warp-40&#34;&gt;OS/2 Warp 4&lt;/a&gt; (as one does) when I noticed that it includes a built-in chess game. I play chess from time to time and thought that this would be a great opportunity to teach &amp;ldquo;the machine&amp;rdquo; a lesson, especially with everything happening with AI right now. I mean, this game is literally 30 years old.&#xA;&lt;img src=&#34;os2-chess-001.png&#34; alt=&#34;OS/2 chess 3.0&#34;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It did not go well. I played three games and I lost three games. It seems that &amp;ldquo;casual chess player&amp;rdquo; is no match for a 1996 chess game. Maybe I shouldn&amp;rsquo;t be surprised: IBM (the company behind this game) went on to build &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Blue_(chess_computer)&#34;&gt;Deep Blue&lt;/a&gt; and defeat the World Chess Champion Garry Kasparov the following year (1997).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Server 1.0</title>
      <link>https://benjaminpagani.com/blog/sql-server-1.0/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://benjaminpagani.com/blog/sql-server-1.0/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s 1989. dBASE IV was released last year and while its position in the market is declining, it still leads with a healthy 63% market share across PC and Macintosh. SQL is becoming a standard (SQL-89) and databases are moving to a client-server model. Microsoft, in a 3-way alliance with Sybase and Ashton-Tate (see more details &lt;a href=&#34;https://books.google.com/books?id=Dz8EAAAAMBAJ&amp;amp;pg=PA1#v=onepage&amp;amp;q&amp;amp;f=false&#34;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;), just released &lt;strong&gt;SQL Server 1.0&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s 2026. And I want to take a look at what SQL Server 1.0 looked like. If you want to do it yourself:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
